The 2.2 version of the Linux kernel used the ipchains application to control the firewall. For standard firewalling, ipchains is a decent solution. We still use it on some of our machines, and there is still a positive argument for 2.2 . . .
The 2.2 version of the Linux kernel used the ipchains application to control the firewall. For standard firewalling, ipchains is a decent solution. We still use it on some of our machines, and there is still a positive argument for 2.2 kernel-based firewalls, because the 2.4 kernel still has some stability issues under heavy load.

Those heavy load issues aside, the 2.4 kernel provides a wealth of networking capabilities 2.2 lacks. These include stateful firewalling and solid quality-of-service options. One could argue that the 2.4 kernel, and its iptables firewall code, enables a person to build intricate firewalls capable of competing with the likes of CheckPoint.

The link for this article located at LinuxWorld is no longer available.